CO129-158 - Sir Kennedy - 1872 [6-8] — Page 433

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

the signatures

or marks made by at least

ninety per cent of the men,

though

I can

usually recognise most of the signatures made by the members

of the European Force

but

this I am only enabled to do through seeing

and in

our

but the hind

Formerly when I complained I could only see a crowd of men standing in the Office round the Clerk's desk at which, I most particularly complained was when the men signed the sheet in our room whilst I was stationed in another room position where I could not even see the desk at which the clerk was seated

My complaints, however, were useless a portion of my duty and so I have continued it ever since.

Some months ago, I proposed different system to the Captain Superintendent;- it was that each man should have a card

and I was told it was

a

that

which should be filled up by the Paymaster showing the amount due to the man, this card should be handed to the man monthly

on his

signing

the Pay sheets and upon by him on his receiving

should be given up

his pay is

this was, however, rejected.

this

When the case was before the Council the Captain Superintendent himself acknowledged that it was impossible for me to witness all the signatures, and at the same time stated that no provision was made for anything of that kind.

May

add further for your

(c.)

my

title

421

Lordship's information that although from

our words be bid to imagine that receive and pay away all sums of money in connection with the Police Department, yet that I am not in this

am not in this way responsible to Government, but have merely paid away small sums from time to time with the view of assisting the head of the Department, and this I have only done

it

the last

the

during year, having been first allowed by "Officer who acted as Paymaster Whilst I " was acting as Assistant Superintendent.

This does not relatively dispose of

the first Charge, but it bears it materially and instead of being a grave Offence, as at first sight it would appear, it assumes "only the shape of a mere irregularity which has existed for years and for which I can scarcely be held responsible

With regard to the sum of $125. to be accounted for I offered to refund the sum as I thought it probable that I might have received it for the months, of September, October and November during

but I

liability for the months of December my 1871 and January 1872.

signatures

Marks, however, were made in the touch-book which were equivalent to a receipt for the sums whilst the men denied ever having

having received

received any such money. When asked by the Council how those marks were made I explained - as I have already stated to your Lordship - all

Edit History

2026-05-20 18:51:58 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
the signatures or marks made by at least ninety per cent of the men, though I can usually recognise most of the signatures made by the members of the European Force but this I am only enabled to do through seeing and in our but the hind Formerly when I complained I could only see a crowd of men standing in the Office round the Clerk's desk at which, I most particularly complained was when the men signed the sheet in our room whilst I was stationed in another room position where I could not even see the desk at which the clerk was seated My complaints, however, were useless a portion of my duty and so I have continued it ever since. Some months ago, I proposed different system to the Captain Superintendent;- it was that each man should have a card and I was told it was a that which should be filled up by the Paymaster showing the amount due to the man, this card should be handed to the man monthly on his signing the Pay sheets and upon by him on his receiving should be given up his pay is this was, however, rejected. this When the case was before the Council the Captain Superintendent himself acknowledged that it was impossible for me to witness all the signatures, and at the same time stated that no provision was made for anything of that kind. May add further for your (c.) my title 421 Lordship's information that although from our words be bid to imagine that receive and pay away all sums of money in connection with the Police Department, yet that I am not in this am not in this way responsible to Government, but have merely paid away small sums from time to time with the view of assisting the head of the Department, and this I have only done it the last the during year, having been first allowed by "Officer who acted as Paymaster Whilst I " was acting as Assistant Superintendent. This does not relatively dispose of the first Charge, but it bears it materially and instead of being a grave Offence, as at first sight it would appear, it assumes "only the shape of a mere irregularity which has existed for years and for which I can scarcely be held responsible With regard to the sum of $125. to be accounted for I offered to refund the sum as I thought it probable that I might have received it for the months, of September, October and November during but I liability for the months of December my 1871 and January 1872. signatures Marks, however, were made in the touch-book which were equivalent to a receipt for the sums whilst the men denied ever having having received received any such money. When asked by the Council how those marks were made I explained - as I have already stated to your Lordship - all
Baseline (Original)
the signatures or marks made by at bast ninaty par cent of the mew, though I can usually recognier most of the signatures made by the enrubbers of the European Forer but this I am only enabled to do three mouth a far mouth enabled to do through sering and in ou but the hind Formerly then I complained I cath only eer a crowd of men standing in the Offer round by the Clerk's dick at which, I most particularly complained was when the mew signed the sheet in our room whilst I was stated in another room position where I couts not even are the disk at which the clerk was crated My complaints, however, were useles a portion of my duty and so I have continued it ever buice. Pomr mouths ago, I propord different eyetem to the Captain superintendent ;- it was that each man shout have a card and I was told it was a that which shorts be filled up by the Paymaster Thorring the amount dur to the man, this card should be handed to the man monthly ou his suming thr. Pay sharts and ups by him on his receiving shonk be given up his pay is this was, however, rejicked. this When the car was before the Council the faptain Superin kundrut himer if acknowledged that it was impossible for me to witness all the signatures, and at the dawe tine stated that no provision was made for amything of that Rind. May add further for your (c.) my title 421 Lordships information that although from our wonts be bid to imagine that recrive and pay away all stoms of monry in connection with the Police Departaret. yet that I am not in this am not in this way responsible Oto Government, but have merely paid away small sume from time to time with the verw of acsicting the head of the Department, and this I have only dour it the last the during year, having been fist clour by "Officer who acted as Paymacks Whilst d " was acting as Assistant Superintendent. This does not rutively dispor of the first Charge, but it beerus it matirially and metad of being a grave Offence, as as first sight it would appear, it accumes "only the shape of a frare irregularity which has existed for years and for which I can scarcely be keto responsible sim With regard to the sum of $125. to be accounted for I offered to refund the sum of the you as I thought it protabe that I might have received it for the mouths, of September, October aut November drnird but I liability for the mouths offecember my 187/1 ould January 1872. signaturs Marks, however, were made in the touchero which were equivalent to a and recript for the sums whilst the mour denied ever having having ucrived ucrived any such money. When acked by the Council how those marks were made I explained - as I have already cour byour fordship - all
2026-05-20 18:51:58 · Baseline
View content

the signatures

or marks made by at bast

ninaty par cent of the mew,

though

I can

usually recognier most of the signatures made by the enrubbers

of the European Forer

but

this I am only enabled to do three mouth a far mouth

enabled to do through sering

and in

ou

but the hind

Formerly then I complained I cath only eer a crowd of men standing in the Offer round by the Clerk's dick at which, I most particularly complained was when the mew signed the sheet in our room whilst I was stated in another room position where I couts not even are the disk at which the clerk was crated

My complaints, however, were useles a portion of my duty and so I have continued it ever buice.

Pomr mouths ago, I propord different eyetem to the Captain superintendent ;- it was that each man shout have a card

and I was told it was

a

that

which shorts be filled up by the Paymaster Thorring the amount dur to the man, this card should be handed to the man monthly

ou his

suming

thr. Pay sharts and ups by him on his receiving

shonk be given up

his pay is

this was, however, rejicked.

this

When the car was before the Council the faptain Superin kundrut himer if acknowledged that it was impossible for me to witness all the signatures, and at the dawe tine stated that no provision was made for amything of that Rind.

May

add further for your

(c.)

my

title

421

Lordships information that although from

our wonts be bid to imagine that recrive and pay away all stoms of monry in connection with the Police Departaret. yet that I am not in this

am not in this way responsible Oto Government, but have merely paid away small sume from time to time with the verw of acsicting the head of the Department, and this I have only dour

it

the last

the

during year, having been fist clour by "Officer who acted as Paymacks Whilst d " was acting as Assistant Superintendent.

This does not rutively dispor of

the first Charge, but it beerus it matirially and metad of being a grave Offence, as as first sight it would appear, it accumes "only the shape of a frare irregularity which has existed for years and for which I can scarcely be keto responsible

sim

With regard to the sum of $125. to be accounted for I offered to refund the sum of the you as I thought it protabe that I might have received it for the mouths, of September, October aut November drnird

but I

liability for the mouths offecember my 187/1 ould January 1872.

signaturs

Marks, however, were made in the touchero which were equivalent to a and recript for the sums whilst the mour denied ever having

having ucrived

ucrived any such money. When acked by the Council how those marks were made I explained - as I have already cour byour fordship - all

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.